• thorhop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Liberalism has always been right from center. You can put neo in front of it all you’d like.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    All I want is the freedom to vote how I want and still count my vote if my first choice didn’t win. Democrats should be free to run their political party how they want. Just like how everyone else should be free to participate in our elections. Free of a spoiler effect.

    There should be no monopoly on the future of our nation. Republican, or Democrat.

    Surely the freedom to vote how people want is not to high a bar for the democrats to clear right? Self proclaimed democracy advocates surely want the people to be represented fully… right?

    I would never force a liberal to vote for my preference in a election, why is it okay for them to do that to me?

    And it is a conscious decision to force me to vote a certain way. Every election democrats mercilessly rage at 3rd party voters. The Democratic party and their voters understand that First-past-the-post voting is flawed. Yet in blue states, fully in control of the Democratic party, FPTP voting shackles the people.

    Democrats understand FPTP voting does a bad job of representing the nation. They ignore this festering gaping mortal wound… all for safe states and easy elections against a complete clown show. One that has defeated them in every way possible.

    The monopoly is over democrats. You never deserved it, and you most certainly do not deserve it now in our darkest hours. Get out of the way, we have to move forward as a nation.

    The Democratic party is not more important then the United States of America.

    Electoral Reform Videos

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think actually a party guilty of genocide should not be free to run in elections, or even free to remain outside of prison

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think chsnging the voting system will fix this. There is still a 2 party system in australia despite a democracy with preferential voting for over 100 years.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I am angry the overton window has moved so far to the right, I’m going to blame the folks trying to move it leftward”

    What hasn’t happened is an IRL movement around a new party or leader. What has happened is lots of “divide the left” memes and posts. I do wonder who that sentiment serves the most.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Leftists are always anti-DNC and focus on organizing over electoralism, so I don’t see why you think this is related to any election coming up.

    • Jentu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The Whig party died because it failed to address the whig voters’ concerns over slave states. The Whigs in charge were too busy trying to find a moderate choice between traditional whig and democratic policies since the Whigs consisted of both northern and southern slave states and were too spineless to pick a side. Zachary Taylor (W), who had never voted or voiced his political opinion prior to running, won the nomination because whig voters in the convention thought being a middle ground candidate was enough to win. And he did win, but…

      After Zachary Taylor was president, Winfield Scott (W), who was running a diet-democratic campaign seeing how it worked with Taylor, was running against Franklin Pierce (D), a dark horse candidate who wasn’t even in the running until the 35th ballot at a stalled democratic convention. Scott, having lost the anti-slavery voters of the northern states, had an enthusiasm issue so big that people of the time regard this is one of the least exciting campaigns in presidential history. After Pierce won the election 254 electoral votes to 42, Free Soil and ex-Whig voters coalesced into the republican party. The whig party had been killed.

      If your party isn’t giving what people are pleading for or isn’t a real opposition party, it’s easier killing the party and starting fresh with something better than trying to lure the lost party back to your own values. And if we’re already putting forth all that effort to build up a new party when one dies, why not be cool and make a revolutionary vanguard party instead of filling the vacuum in bourgeois elections?

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Liberals call this “purity testing,” but fundamentally the democrats stand for perpetuating capitalism and imperialism. These two points of contention are irreconcilable with any leftist.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Kinda? The spectrum aspect is a bit iffy and I don’t use it, but there are absolutely socialists on the left and capitalists on the right, and that’s useful for understanding. Trying to argue over which is more or less left or right doesn’t usually matter as much as the left/right distinction outright.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nothing new, in a profoundly capitalist structure like the US, there are no other options than to choose between conservatism and fascism, substituting reason for “in God we trust” and “Stars and Stripes”, to keep citizens ignorant and obedient to continue functioning.

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Their strategy is to give into Trump’s demands in the hopes that it prevents him from destroying their precious institutions. They hope to be able to take over from an unpopular Republican party after Trump dies without really undoing the damage he’s done. The problem with this approach is that it will prevent the system from needing to be properly rebuilt, effectively legalizing most of his abuses of power and prolonging the instability of our country. A big part of this will be institutionalizing the blatant corruption and oligarchy while further rigging elections to make it impossible for popular movements to ever legally gain power.

    A Gavin Newsom or Pete Buttigieg presidency will see them ruling as a weaker feudal king than Trump, but only to promote business activity and interests. Relying on the honeymoon period following Trump’s removal, they will position themselves as the saviors of “democracy,” yet they will do little to actually undo a lot of the election rigging that Republicans are installing right now. They will suppress workers rights and throw the most disposable minorities under the bus, deregulating and burning through all the goodwill they have. They’ll parade the corpse of liberalism around as long as fools will believe it, but it will be a cynical gesture.

    In order for actual liberal democracy to exist again in this country, the liberals would need to have shown a backbone and resist Trump no matter how much he destroys institutions. They would need to risk temporary jail time and potential assassination to invigorate long term support for a rebuilt American dream. Instead they’re showing that they never cared about liberal ideals, only the goodwill liberalism afforded their power.

    • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeh. The strategy seems to be to wait for their “turn” and make it look like the care while they watch everything they claim to stand for be destroyed.

  • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    You could’ve made this image using paint in under 5 minutes, did you really need to waste half a liter of water to have AI generate it?

    • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Training models takes a stupid amount of energy. Using them after the fact uses very little.

      I could generate something like this on my phone using any of the dozens of local models.

      • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I could generate something like this on my phone using any of the dozens of local models.

        Feel free to share the device type and local AI model capable of producing an image like this. My guess is you won’t though because it’s not possible 😕

        • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Try for yourself https://github.com/ShiftHackZ/Stable-Diffusion-Android

          But that’s (very clearly) beside the point, which is that you can run a variety of models locally on your PC or phone for miniscule energy. Once a model is trained the damage has already been done.

          As always, it’s the corporations using the resources and doing the damage, so pearl clutching about random individuals is less than useless.

        • m532@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Try Z-Image Turbo it’s super new and runs on any computer with, like, a cpu and 24 GB ram. It can generate way better images than this too.

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI-generating images takes, like, zero resources. Think about it. My computer uses very little energy. It couldn’t even heat my room if I ran it constantly (I accidentally tried by forgetting to turn on the heater). It can create an image in 20 seconds. There is no magic in AI that increases its wattage somehow. Also, I don’t know if you noticed yet, but computers don’t have a water input plug. Using a dishwasher once uses more electricity than generating thousands of images, and more water than infinite images.

    • REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Turns out supporting genocide makes you look bad. Someone should’ve told Biden and Copmallah.

      It’s almost as if your party duopoly consists of two fascist parties.

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny, I remember us ending up with Trump because the Democrat party views its own voters with abject contempt and forced an 80yo genocidal madman on the electorate twice without a legitimate primary where Barrack Obama doesn’t order anybody to drop out… but sure, it’s the voters’ fault for not liking that the DNC won’t even deign to pander to its own voters. This is a smart take that is in no way a sign of Stockholm syndrome identifying with your abuser…