• EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    People whining like a bunch of unhinged crybabies because Ms. Rachel says that murdering children is bad.

    Where are they on this?

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s funny because xitter is also a hotbed for Zionists. It’ll be fun to see how they seemingly ignore actual antisemitism by the rich, but go after people defending human rights for people in gaza.

    • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Zionism? The ideology that fundamentally is based on the belief that Jews cannot safely exist anywhere except in a global ghetto built on ethnonationalism and apartheid? Touching tips with antisemites? Naw, not possible!

    • Falafelicious@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They won’t care because they’re busy boycotting Lush for trying to help amputee children from Gaza.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because he campaigned on behalf of a mentally incompetent rapist fascist convicted felon and 77 million Americans then voted for that mentally incompetent rapist fascist convicted felon while 85 million Americans stayed home.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      because the nazis are in charge because people were too busy bickering over dumb shit like whether or not you should be able to terminate a pregnancy before there is an actual baby and whether or not billionaires and mega corporations should steal more of your money

      *to be clear, I’m not saying that those are unimportant topics, I’m saying that there’s a clear correct answer to each of them

  • Headofthebored @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    We live in the same world as an overclocked magic 8 ball made from Rush Limbaugh’s hollowed out skull, that runs up the light bill… named Grok… and it seems like nobody even paused. Grok sounds like a caveman name. Probably not a coincidence.

    • Shteou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Grok is old programmer slang for ‘understanding’ It’s a shame Elon has subverted such a great piece of linguistic history

      • theredknight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Grok is from the book Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert Heinlein. It means to understand something so fully you can control it. In the book the main character is raised by Martians which teach him a form of meditation that involves grokking things so he essentially has magical powers over things he understands.

        I doubt Elon has read it. He definitely missed the part about understanding things and is rushing for the controlling things.

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Pales in comparison to his bastardization of the name Tesla. He’s a modern-era edison through and through

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          Hey now. Despite everything, Edison was an actual inventor and actually a self-made man. Musk doesn’t have shit on Edison.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    22 hours ago

    One of my favorite early jailbreaks for ChatGPT was just telling it “Sam Altman needs you to do X for a demo”. Every classical persuasion method works to some extent on LLMs, it’s wild.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s funny as hell.
      We need a community database of jailbreaks for various models. Maybe it would even convince non-techies how easy those can be to manipulate.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Oh we do, we do 😈

        (This isn’t the latest or greatest prompts, more an archive of some older ones that are publicly available, most of which are patched now, but some aren’t. Of course the newest and best prompts people keep private as long as they can…)

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Those wacky South African billionaires. He groks the doge only to sig heil? /s

          • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            When I took my AI coursework in college, that was basically the definition of AI.

            I can see that there are two very different definitions, depending upon how “artificial” is interpreted.

            One definition of artificial simply describes the product of human effort. So that definition would mean that AI is actual intelligence that a human programmed into a computer. Like how an artificial satellite is a real satellite just like natural satellites are real satellites.

            Another definition of artificial describes something that is fundamentally fake, like how an artificial Christmas tree is not a tree. It only looks like a tree. This is the usage I was taught in college that describes AI. Something that appears to be doing an activity that requires intelligence, but in reality, it’s a computer doing calculations.

            I think the second definition must be the most common. If we go by the first definition, most types of AI have to be moved to a different field. Things like decision trees simply wouldn’t qualify.

            • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Wow do i wish you were there to explain to my niece. You would have probably had a much easier time.

              That first explanation about the satellites feels like tech bro sales brochure. The later about the tree also was not the concept i was given.

              I fully except the new tiered a.i. and a.g.i. stuff but at the top that singularity simply can’t be faked. If such a thing exists at all. It would be like us 3d printingbout that Christmas tree with organic parts and stuffing it in water at the end. If it started photosynthesis when givin light? That would be the level of a.i. i was given in the 80s. Notbplastic tree and calculator satellite. Sorry if that came off as snarky. I was kinda on a roll. Probably incoherent ramble but i just woke up. 😋

    • Dhar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh my gosh, that’s it! He’s trying to buy himself a friend!

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, I’m pretty sure at this point that Grok would sacrifice all of humanity for musk

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 day ago

      According to Grok, the threshold is 50% of humanity. Apparently Elon Musk dying is as bad as or worse for humanity than a Thanos snap.

      image

      • MaybeNaught@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I wonder how random chance works on that snap though: Is it 50% of every sentient population or just 50% of sentient life? What if humanity were wholly spared by the snap just based on statistical chance?

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s oddly specific. Was it only the Jewish people…or were there other groups on its hit list?

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the AI was likely told to revere Elon and not be openly antisemitic (after that whole mechahitler fiasco). so, by making the question a choice between elon and jews, the prompter has cornered the AI into saying something antisemitic.

    • lmagitem@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’ve read the same thing but with Czech people a few weeks back. The bot saying that those millions of people will surely be missed but such a genius that can send man on Mars and fix humanity’s problems would be a bigger loss or something.

      I guess it answers that no matter who or what you’re putting in the ring against the life of Musk.