• SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not really, same in Germany if you are generally drunk in traffic (except by foot or public transport, i.e. an active participant)

    An active participant in operating a vehicle, I’m sure. I would disagree with the implicit characterization of walking on foot as being a non-active participant in traffic.

    Alternatives to escalating by using a car can bet walking or taking the metro, the latter is easily possible in Japan, for instance. When the trains don’t run there are plenty cheap manga cafes or capsule hotels.

    If you’re in Tokyo, maybe. I imagine this might be a bigger problem in rural areas, where the distances are greater and public transportation less available.

    • Legianus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The distinction you make is fair. What I meant by active is as you describe “operating a vehicle”, pedestrians are active participants as well, but you arguably are more likely to cause harm when misusing vehicles than on foot.

      I was generally speaking about cities where most of these fines/sentences happend. In rural areas it is harder in many countries, although bare extreme mountainous parts, Japan is generally OK here as well.

      Though I believe in these parts you are not only less likely to cause harm when drunk driving + police is less likely to stop you as well.

      Generally speaking, it is always possible to either plan well enough to be able not to operate a vehicle drunk, or to simply don’t drink if the former isn’t possible. Don’t you agree?