We all have a choice. To stand, not kneel. To oppose, not obey. To live, not just exist
No in the current system because it will only lead to inflation, and everything comes from the almighty State exercising economic violence on the common people.
Actually no in general since as an anarchist I believe in tackling the necessities of the people but money isn’t a necessity.
My very European company is closing plants in Europe and has several in China, I don’t think they will tackle that, probably just us poor-customers.
It’s the internet, if you have something worth saying say it, someone will find it useful in the future.
they industrialized quickly but easily fell to corruption and ended up falling to capitalism
Without mentioning they are the biggest polluters in the world. The USSR did so much damage that it’s still the top in some pollution statistics.
ML is a destroyer of worlds.
the resurgance of capitalism
Anarcocapitalism can very well be one of those communities as long as it doesn’t extinguish the freedom of choice of communities that don’t want to partake in that and respects their choice and their living space.
People can figure it out, we are just not ready as a species our greed is too big and Marxisms is another proof of that greed.
The anarchists can either concede that smartphones are unnecessary (along with anything else that takes such huge production scales to create), or concede that they depend on outside production that can do so.
Of course if an anarchist community desires smartphone they will depend on other anarchist communities for the resources to build it or to acquire what they build. One of his early points is that in an anarchist world there will be a lot of anarchist communities and they will be different to one another because different people, different needs but that doesn’t mean they will fight, they will co-exist, respect each other, depend on each other and share.
The exact quote was:
Anarchism is about creating social structures and improve the lives of those in these structures. There is no end goal or concrete structure to these structures. They change and adapt as the people within them change, leave or enter.
For some the concept of leaving is difficult, because in some of the systems the individual doesn’t have a choice but anarchism is also about choice.
No sign of intelligence there.
Game, set and match… believer?