• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m about as atheist as they come, but it seems pretty settled history that the man existed and was politically impactful

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      He was most likely a real guy. But a guy Christian’s would absolutely hate: a brown Communist Palestinian who hung out with prostitutes, lepers, pariahs, refuted the legitimacy of the state, and organized massive mutual aid events to feed the poor. Probably a good dude. It’s a shame his followers are dicks though.

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m an anti-theist, and I used to be on this page, but a while ago I read about how even this might not be true. We don’t have any real proof he existed at all.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Right. It’s applying the same standard of evidence that we use for everything else on history. Truth is, we don’t have great evidence for pretty much anyone who wasn’t a regional ruler. If you rose the standard much higher, you’d end up with history being a big blank, and that’s not useful.

          In other words, if you reject a historical Jesus outright, you also have to reject Socrates and Spartacus and a whole lot of others.