garbage account

  • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    AI is trained on the Internet. Look at the bullshit on the Internet. AI will take some random schmoe’s bullshit opinion and present it as hard fact.

    That, and it just re-introduced the problem of being able to see search results without visiting any of the resultant websites. The last time, sites ended up burying answers down the page to avoid being able to see results in search previews. Making everything shittier. What kind of response is there going to be to AI summaries? Everything will undoubtedly get even shittier as sites try to get people to visit and not just read the AI summary. Hello even more obfuscation. We’re taking the greatest method of spreading information around the globe ever devised and just absolutely filling it to the brim with bullshit.

    • oakward@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is only the beginning. Soon there will be LLMs trained on other LLMs garbage. And those LLMs will also post and write crap on the Internet. The true pinnacle of shite posting

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      oh yea it does, i see google summarizing, its just a mash up of different BLOG posts as truths, that isnt a source. its basically asking opinions of the LLM.

  • Klear@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is that Brian “Please don’t call me Brian “Brian Kibler” Kibler” Kibler?

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hate the fact that thanks to chatgpt, every twerp out there things em-dashes are an automatic sign of something being written by ai…

    As a writer and an em-dash enjoyer, hell with that!

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The technology is way too resource intensive for the benefit it gives. By resource, I mean environmental and technological. Have you seen the prices of DDR5 RAM? Microsoft is actually working to bring TMI 1 back online. TMI = Three Mile Island as in a full sized nuclear reactor that has been retired from service since 2019. The only reason why they are not bringing TMI2 back online is because IF F$%KING MELTED DOWN IN 1979.

    Add to that Micron exited the consumer market to provide memory to the AI market only… What the actual F#$k?

    Now the bubble has formed and the people that shoved tens of billions into it are trying to fill that bubble by any means necessary. Which means the entire population of this country are constantly bombarded by it for purposes it is ill suited to.

    When, not if, this bubble pops it’s going to be a wild ride.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      At some point, we should legislate that all non production tech buisnesses have to be energy positive- as in 'wanna build a data center? Its got to have more solar/ wind etc, tha it uses or its unpermitable.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve seen it successfully perform exactly one task without causing more harm or crearing liability for the people using it:

    Misinformation campaigns.

    And thats exactly how the AI Companies are using to to grow exponentially, lying about its costs and its capabilities both.

    It’s weird that this is somehow an unpopular opinion these days but I don’t like being lied to.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ive been hearong the claim now occasionally For the last several years that we’ve moved into the ‘post truth’ age. AI has kind of cemented that for me.

  • Greenbeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t hate AI, I hate it being forced everyone’s throat and I don’t trust the companies running it to keep the data they collect safe and private

  • drhodl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t hate AI. I just hate the untrustworthy rich fucks who are forcing it down everyones throats.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I hate AI because it’s replacing jobs (a.k.a, salaries) without us having a social safety net to make it painless.

    We’ve replaced you with ai

    -CEO

    Ai is replacing most of the jobs, and there isn’t enough open positions to be filled by the now unemployed.

    -Ecconomists

    I need food stamps, medical care, housing assistantance, and unemployment.

    -Me

    No! Get a job you lazy welfare queen!

    -Politicians

    Where? There aren’t any.

    -Me

    Not my problem! Now, excuse me while I funnel more money to my donors.

    -The same politicians

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The good news is, while automation like robot arms is continuing to replace humans, the AI aspect of it has been catastrophic and early adopters are often seen expressing remorse and reverting changes.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t hate it, I hate how companies are forcing it in regardless of how stupid it is for the task.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s probably from a redditor who probably is white and male. Y’know, self-deprecating humor is pretty common among redditors just like it is here.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This isn’t a Twitter screenshot, it’s a Facebook one. Note the globe icon, that means a public post on Facebook. He’s also a niche microcelebrity, so the verification kinda makes sense?

          It seems he’s stopped posting on Twitter after 2024, having 70k posts total - so he must’ve quit cold turkey. No blue check on his Twitter profile.

          There’s also this tweet from him in 2017. I do not think this man is a nazi, or even nazi-adjacent.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I never said anything about nazis.

            I only know blue check marks from twitter. There’s really not much difference between the two though.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              …Why is a blue check mark on Twitter bad if not for the fact that paying for it supports a nazi platform? I’m not sure I follow your logic.

              The Meta one isn’t paid, it’s just something you’re given if they can verify you’re who you say you are.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Mark Zuckerberg isn’t that much different from Elon Musk as far as politics go.

                If you want to be verified, you should just have a personal website that you publicly direct people to. Using someone else’s social media website as your primary soap box has always been madness.

                • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  So you would click accept on my self-signed https website? Want some land in Florida?

      • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        just feels wrong

        like it’s making stereotypes feel normal and creating xenophobia or something

        when done humorously, it’s fine, but here it just seems serious

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          But it is done humorously, is that not an obvious joke?

          Maybe not the funniest joke ever, but definitely not something someone’s saying seriously.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t hate AI (specifically LLMs and image diffusion thingy) as a technology. I don’t hate people who use AI (most of the time).

    I do hate almost every part of AI business, though. Most of the AI stuff is hyped by the most useless “luminaries” of the tech sector who know a good profitable grift when they see one. They have zero regard for the legal and social and environmental implications of their work. They don’t give a damn about the problems they are causing.

    And that’s the great tragedy, really: It’s a whole lot of interesting technology with a lot of great potential applications. And the industry is getting run to the ground by idiots, while chasing an economic bubble that’s going to end disastrously. It’s going to end up with a tech cycle kind of similar to nuclear power: a few prominent disasters, a whole lot of public resentment and backlash, and it’ll take decades until we can start having sensible conversations about it again. If only we would have had a little bit of moderation to begin with!

    The only upside AI business has had was that at least it has pretended to give a damn about open source and open access to data, but at this point it’s painfully obvious that to AI companies this is just a smoke screen to avoid getting sued over copyright concerns - they’d lock up everything as proprietary trade secrets if they could have their way.

    As a software developer, I was first super excited about genAI stuff because it obviously cut down the time needed to consult references. Now, a lot of tech bosses tell coders to use AI tools even in cases that’s making everyone less productive.

    As an artist and a writer I find it incredibly sad that genAI didn’t hit the brakes a few years ago. I’ve been saying this for decades: I love a good computerised bullshit generator. Algorithmically generated nonsense is interesting. Great source of inspiration for your ossified brain cells, fertile grounds for improvement. Now, however, the AI generated stuff pretends to be as human-like as possible, it’s doing a terrible job at it. Tech bros are half-assedly marketing it as a “tool” for artists, while the studio bosses who buy the tech chuckle at that and know they found a replacement for the artists. (Want to make genAI tools for artists? Keep the output patently unusable out of the box.)

    • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The value in LLMs is in the training and the data quality… so it is easy to publish the code and charge for access to the data (DaaS).

    • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m hopeful that when the bubble pops it’ll be more like the dot com crash, which is to say that the fallout is mostly of the economic variety rather than the superfund variety. Sure, that’ll still suck in the short term. But it will ideally lead to the big players and VC firms backing away and leaving behind an oversupply of infrastructure and talent that can be soaked up at fire sale prices by the smaller, more responsible companies that are willing to stick out the downturn and do the unglamorous work of developing this technology into something that’s actually sustainable and beneficial to society.

      That’s my naive hope. I do recognize that there’s an unfortunately high probability that things won’t go that way.

  • VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I don’t hate AI. However, I:

    • Am concerned about the labor displacement it may cause–though I am skeptical it will be as widespread as currently feared. I think many of the companies that have cut workers already will end up regretting it in the medium term.
    • Am convinced that the massive, circular investment in this technology has produced an economic bubble that will burst in the coming years. Because we have so little insight into private credit markets, we don’t know to what degree retail and commercial banks will be exposed, and thus can’t anticipate the potential damage to the broader economy.
    • Am fatigued (but unsurprised) that the US government is not considering thoughtful regulation that anticipates the disruption that AI is likely to cause.
    • Am cognizant of its current limitations.
    • Do not currently believe that AGI is imminent or even guaranteed. I think elites peddling this notion may be captured by highly motivated reasoning. In some cases, it seems like a bit of a belief system.
  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Anything the billionaire cabal pushes on us I automatically hate. Don’t even need to know what it is. If they are pushing it you know there is some nefarious shit under the hood.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m still waiting for it to appear and then lets ask them how they like it. Its not like the garbage we have now is really AI.