If you take their answer as “historical precedent that’s never been overturned” then it makes sense, And the question becomes “why did it get overturned for pigs and catfish?”

It’s like the Sydney Sweeney interview where you mistook one of the set crew for Sydney Sweeney

Yeah. You didn’t ask me a question. Pay attention. You’re continuing to embarrass yourself

Talk about a leap.

That’s like if I asked you “Just to be clear, you think all those officers, their families and children should have been shot?”

I guess the purpose is to explore that question, for me that’s it.