• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      For some reason I didn’t see your M earlier.

      Nevertheless, it now seems like you wanted to publicly have an argument with OP over the use of the term, but instead of directly calling them out on it, you phrased it as a request for information, perhaps in the hopes of trapping them into betraying their prejudices or something.

      Now other people started trying to answer your question, which doesn’t meet the agenda you were trying to push and you’re acting like people were unreasonable or silly for answering your question, but you asked it openly on an open discussion forum and in a way that didn’t mention OP and just seemed to be phrased like a request for information.

      Being a mod is about moderating discussion, not controlling or directing it. I don’t think it’s about blanket control over who speaks.

      (By way of balance, some of the mod actions in this thread have been absolutely spot on, thank you.)

      • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Hey, I was only rudely replying to the comment which was oversimplifying a lot of positions as a way to get back at them (and then kinda disingaged). I don’t really take issue with the other comments, since as you said, the question was worded abiguously on purpose.
        TBH I’m just tired of the whole semantic circus around muddy words like “tankie”, hence my harsh reactions LOL (sowwy ~w~)

        Also I have a shitposting side that’s hard to turn off ^^’

        Oh and thanks for the constructive feedback, positive and negative :)

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I was only rudely replying to the comment which was oversimplifying a lot of positions as a way to get back at them.

          I may be overly aspergic about this, I accept, but please try to say what you mean more.

          Instead of “Please define tankie”, why not say “@OP, tankie is a muddy and overused word, please state what you mean by it, and if you don’t have a useful and valid meaning for the term, avoid it.”

          Instead of “You’re not OP”, why not say “Wow, you’ve certainly oversimplified a lot of positions there!”.

          I’m afraid I’m finding your hidden meanings constantly unsettling. I don’t mind you disagreeing with people and entering firmly into the debate, and I thoroughly approve of the bans you put in place, but I’m finding the indirectness harder to come to terms with.

          TBH I’m just tired of the whole semantic circus around muddy words like “tankie”

          This is the best thing you’ve said. I found it properly eye-opening because it communicates something about how the word is used that wasn’t as clear in my mind as it is now.


          Hey,

          :)

          Btw, I liked this whole comment overall a lot because it was open and honest, showed me how you feel, made you human and very relatable, and clarified concepts for me. Quadruple win!

          • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Hey I’m autistic too, but for some reason I really love sarcasm, shitposting and all that jazz. (edit: even if I sometimes don’t get it myself when on the receiving end LOL)

            Your point about being clearer when commenting as mod is very much valid (saved your comment above) and something I should probably keep in mind, but sometimes my fable for sarcasm and shitposting just wins over ^^’

            I liked this short exchange as well ^w^