Oh look the wizards of the coast are holding the orbs for magic the gathering together. They are highlighting great deck color combinations too. Right? Right?
It would be more efficient if they stood with their dicks end to end, and each jerker could maximize stroke time by stroking middle-out, two dick per hand, that’s four dicks each.
Then hot swapping in new dicks on the opposing down stroke.
ok ulrich
Jrkbuntu
Cursed Ubuntu (Cumbuntu)
“oh how wholesome, they’re holding ha-… Oh.”
each other microphones,
Ah right of course! Silly me!
Impressive coordination
Is it tho? Seems like you have one top hand and one bottom hand. I get the top hand needs to be working but do you suppose the bottom has requires that much effort?
Please mark as NSFW!
Impressive graphic design
jercling
The logo for the community … CIRCLEJERK
2 hands!?
Double your pleasure, double your fun
For a decrease in MJT.
Red and green need to switch sides with blue and and black. Clockwise it goes W G R B U
sad Mark Rosewater noises
I looked more closely and their heads have the same shading as the dots on the card back. OP posted an MtG meme and didn’t even realize it lol
Why he sad?
WUBRG out of order. Mark Rosewater is basically the boss of Magic: the Gathering, and seeing his beloved color pie in disarray is sure to bring him to the point of tears. Also, I’ve been informed on multiple occasions that explaining the joke makes it funnier, so I hope that this was not only informative, but also peak comedy, thank you
jubilant Mark Wahlberg orgasm noises
Ironic, coming from the most ban happy instance on Lemmy.
If you don’t like what you see here in this lemmy community or my account block me. I recommend it. I block all the people who leave me dumbass comments making excuses for American imperialism. Libs can’t seem to follow the rules and really dig in, no one is going to ban you for this shitty comment you left. Lemmy is censorship proof meaning even if you get banned from an instance you are still free to use the service and even set up your own instance and communities.
Screenshotting people, collecting dossiers on their wrong-think and circlejerking about your intellectual superiority in harassment communities is a form of thought policing. Where libs attempt to intimidate and influence people to actually stop participating. It is way crazier and more pathetic than being moderated on a forum that there are people here that sit here for hours collecting and posting information for outrage.
You admit you dont engage with them - which is a perfectly reasonable choice you can make, to be clear - but without an ability to criticize the source, it’s natural for them to form a community to voice their objections to your ideas, and for that community to include context. The antagonism between .ml and non-.ml users enthusiastically goes both ways (the memes you’ve posted here are example enough of that, as is my use of .ml as shorthand for “people that are tankies”). If you don’t want to continue it, it’s probably best to take the classic advice and not feed the trolls.
I don’t really believe a lot of the enthusiasm is coming from people willing to learn or engage in good faith. I’m happy to answer people who aren’t just demanding the US imperial point of view is true and valid by default valid and that I’m some kind of idiot/bot/fed for not agreeing with them.
Sure, and you’re just as complicit in the culture of antagonism as they are. I’m not advocating for your tolerant interaction in the face of hostility, I’m just pointing out that you’re posting blatant ragebait then claiming that the people who take that bait are somehow behaving worse than you are or that they’re not engaging in good faith.
If you think this is ragebait then block me, problem solved. That is what I said at the beginning. I am not posting these memes for you, I don’t care about you at all. There are people who use this service and instance that agree and like these memes. They’re funny. This is for them. If you are getting enraged online, sign the fuck out.
I do think that presenting your critics as cartoon caricatures of thought police is bait, yes. But I don’t particularly care that you’re doing it - I’m just pointing out that a culture of antagonism isn’t the same thing as a culture of persecution, and that you engage in extremely similar behavior to the people you yourself are demonizing. You’re characterizing me as mad about this and I’m truly not (nor have I indicated I even feel particularly strongly about it), but you’re still basing your responses in this interaction as though I am. Why assume that?
